(1761-1828) |
The Influential Count Camillo Marcolini for
Prof. Marcuse's lecture course
|
& Abstract |
and Links |
About Daniel Razzari I am a fourth year history major at UCSB. I am primarily interested in English history and early modern Italy. I am currently working on a project that focuses on Sir Francis Drake’s raids on the Iberian Peninsula, particularly Portugal. I have a limited knowledge of German history, and wanted to take the opportunity to study Germany outside of the twentieth-century. I chose Ferdinand von Funck’s memoirs because I wanted to come to some sort of understanding of early nineteenth-century Germany through the eyes of one society’s elites. It was also of interest to see what possible internal issues made it easy for Napoleon to advance through the German states. Abstract (back to top) Ferdinand von Funck’s memoir discusses the years between 1807 and 1809 in Saxony. Von Funck was born on December 13, 1761 and died on August 17, 1828. He was Adjutant-General to Frederick Augustus, the king of Saxony, or simply his assistant. A small section is devoted to discussing Frederick Augustus’ childhood, and how his childhood made it easy for Count Camillo Marcolini to manipulate Frederick. Funck discussed court issues, Marcolini’s influence over Frederick, and Napoleon’s control in Saxony. One of the major themes throughout is the use of Saxon troops in Napoleon’s Grande Armée. Napoleon was fond of the Saxon cavalry unit, and wanted a sizeable contingent to use within his overall force. Ferdinand von Funck was in charge of assembling the cavalry contingent for Napoleon. The memoir also discusses problems concerning the treatment of Saxon troops by Saxon leaders. Although the memoir discusses Saxony on a wide spectrum of issues, focused primarily on Napoleon’s occupation, Funck constantly attributes several of the state's problems to Marcolini. Finally, a portion of the memoir discusses Napoleon's merging or handing control of Poland to Frederick Augustus. |
Essay (back to top) The Influential Count Camillo Marcolini Summary
The memoir of Ferdinand von Funck is important because it allows historians to grasp certain aspects of Frederick Augustus’ court in Saxony. We know that von Funck was close to Frederick Augustus from reading his memoirs. On several occasions Frederick consulted von Funck about political affairs, court affairs, and other issues that emerged. The memoirs were written between the years of 1807 and 1809. Frederick Augustus had become king of Saxony in 1806. Funck was in his mid forties during the period his memoirs cover. Napoleon, at this time, had pushed into Germany, and the Saxon court was soon subject to Napoleon. Saxons, internal influence from Italian Count Camillo Marcolini was terrible for the state. Some, such as Funck, realized that Marcolini controlled Frederick, yet little could be done. I will argue, from Funck’s point of view, that ambitious individuals such as Marcolini hindered Saxony from reforming certain aspects such as the military, and how their influence over Frederick was too great for the king to break away from.
The beginning of the text discusses Frederick’s isolation growing up as a child. His mother controlled him. She isolated him in such a way that he became physically weak.
The remainder of the memoir expresses Napoleon’s influence and even power over the Saxon court. Within this memoir, Funck also describes an elaborate Saxon court, where etiquette and dress appeared to be more important than matters of the state. Frederick, isolated as a child, rarely made decisions on his own or trusted in his own opinion. Marcolini continued to monitor and control Frederick’s audiences and those at court who had access to the king. Nearly all affairs of the state had to pass through Marcolini, since he held several offices of great importance (Funck p. 39-40). The memoir makes it clear that Frederick esteemed Ferdinand von Funck. Funck’s memoirs describe to us Frederick’s interaction with the French court in Dresden, and his encounter with Napoleon. At one point Funck is given orders from Napoleon to raise a contingent of Saxons to aid his army. It is particularly interesting to note Funck’s response to Napoleon, or general attitude towards French occupation, which was obedient. Marcolini’s opportunity In von Funck’s opinion, Count Marcolini was a virus that Frederick was unable to remove or perhaps did not realize needed to be removed from the Saxon court. According to von Funck:
Marcolini ambitiously befriended the young prince, and his constant goal was to control the prince and lure him into dependency (Funck p.7). The young prince must have been excited about the attention he received from Marcolini; this enabled Marcolini to remain close to Frederick until he was king of Saxony. Both Gutschmid and Marcolini worked hard to keep people with mediocre intelligence in senior positions (Funck12). The obvious purpose was to keep possible influential people away from the king, consequently enabling both Marcolini and Gutschmid to control the court or outwit them. Gutschmid reasoned that it was much more efficient to surround yourself with those of mediocre minds rather than intellects of society (Funck 12). Frederick did not seem to understand that it allowed Marcolini to control most of the government, because any real opposition had been excluded from senior positions, or positions of influence.
The Military Question: strengthen or ignore? Marcolini watched Frederick closely. It was among his greatest fears that he would have to join the king on the battlefield; therefore, it was important for him to force the elector down other paths of interest (Funck p.19). He tried to keep Frederick busy with other activities, such as hunting, but also overwhelmed him with paperwork. The king spent long hours studying, and working on extensive piles of paperwork that Marcolini had given him. The king soon developed a character that may have affected the loyalty of his soldiers. “His duties became habits, and his habits duties” (Funck p.24). This seemed to have evolved into the idea that people had jobs and it was their duty to perform those jobs under any conditions or circumstances that may be present. Frederick was not sympathetic to those soldiers who were patriotic; he felt that it was their duty to follow orders and accept the orders given (Funck p.126). Based on Funck’s view of Frederick, we can assume that it was Fredrick’s opinion that soldiers experienced a difficult life on the battlefield, and their small provisions of bread and water were to be sufficient. Frederick felt it was unnecessary to burden his people with higher taxes in order to fill the stomachs of his troops (Funck p.127). It was a hard life, that was to be expected, and the soldiers would have to deal with the lack of food and concentrate on their job at hand. Raiding of provisions was condemned by severe punishment, and essentially his soldiers were left to starve. Perhaps, in my opinion, his strenuous laboring over paper work, and other tasks Marcolini had reserved for him created a sense of self-discipline; which he felt all others of society should possess. Soldiers developed attitudes, according to Funck, that victory or defeat mattered little because their treatment remained the same regardless of their actions in battle (Funck p.128). Funck reiterates my point when he states that, “..I told him that three whole days before the battle of Jena the troops had had no bread, that they had to fight on empty stomachs” (Funck p. 129). Frederick had been informed by Funck of the condition of the men before the battle of Jena. He was shocked when he heard how they were treated. Frederick did not concern himself much with military matters and it would seem that Marcolini had successfully weaned him from military interests.
It seems clear that Marcolini’s influence had been strong enough to persuade Frederick away from listening to the advice of others. Frederick had neglected the health of his troops, which is quite dangerous when a leader needs his troops for support. In contrast, according to Funck, Frederick remained concerned with the attire worn at court more than the affairs of his military, which I will discuss shortly. His lack of interest in the military was unfortunate, as many of his soldiers held anti-French views and he could have rallied them. The army, as Funck points out, had several grievances about the French alliance (Funck p. 139). This is important because eventually several companies refused to march, and mutiny occurred, which upset Frederick. This was an opportunity for Frederick because Napoleon was suffering defeat on all fronts, but Frederick failed to acknowledge this (Funck p. 139). The light of opportunity was soon snuffed out, as mutinies were immediately stopped. Later in Danzig, Saxon troops were placed under authority of the French. The troops were fed well, and any animosity they held towards the French soon dissipated. The soldiers were properly fed and conditions much better than under the control of Saxon leaders (Funck p. 151). “So easy is it to win the good graces of the rank and file if you will only see that their needs are not neglected” (Funck p. 151). Marcolini certainly was not concerned with the affairs of state, only those of his own gain. His influence superceded reason, and Frederick found himself concerned more with proper dress in court, than the soldiers who fought his battles. At any rate, it was much safer for Marcolini, if Frederick concerned himself with apparel rather than military affairs. Funck was completely astonished at the fact that forgiveness could be obtained by those who break discipline, blunder on duty, or exhibited plain ignorance; but “transgression against dress regulations” was intolerable and must be punished (Funck p.132). Frederick’s lack of concern for issues that were important for the welfare of the state is appalling, but he continued to follow his teachers closely. Funk’s view of Marcolini as a thief While Marcolini essentially controlled Frederick’s thoughts and actions, he also enriched himself.
It is quite possible that Funck’s opinion of Marcolini was somewhat distorted, possibly from jealousy. According to the editor, he was loyal and devoted to Frederick (Funck p. 28). The editor also points out that Funck occasionally would credit Marcolini for some of his advice, but he would soon after ridicule Marcolini’s advice by stating, for instance, “it did not always suit his purpose; on great occasions, however, it had to suit them because his own advantage was involved in it” (Funck p.49). Although Funck may have had a distorted view of Marcolini, there is a small piece of evidence that suggests that Marcolini was quite controlling and feared losing control:
The previous quote, taken from the editor, seems to express Marcolini as a nervous individual.
Conclusion Aside from Marcolini absorbing large sums of money from the state, it was probably more devastating for Saxony to have their king controlled or lured as Marcolini desired, as is the opinion of Funck. The primary argument was to show how Marcolini’s control over Frederick as a child, allowed for him to lead the king as he saw fit. He led the king in directions that protected his own interests. It should have been clear that Marcolini’s influence prevailed over reason. Although Frederick understood the seriousness of the situation, he was not willing to adjust accordingly and separate from the teachings of Marcolini and Gutschmid. However, many of Funck’s arguments and complaints may have been severely biased. Funck points out several moments in his memoirs where Marcolini and himself held conflicting views, which Marcolini prevailed. Some of Funck’s negative portrayals of Marcolini may have originated from being overshadowed by him. Also Funck’s opinion on Frederick’s early life had been drawn from what others around him thought, especially the views of Marcolini himself. Oakley Williams also points out that Funck and Marcolini were adversaries, so some of the views may be correct but exaggerated slightly. Throughout the paper I formed an argument based on Funck’s view, but it needs to be understood that Funck’s view of Marcolini may have be seriously distorted. Since this remains the only source I could draw from, it would be difficult to refute anything Funck had said. For this reason I presented an argument according to Funck’s view, but I made several suggestions in footnotes of what could have been possible according to the period and situation Saxony was enduring. |
Bibliography and Links (back to top) Related Books
Relevant Links
|
Any student tempted to use this paper for an assignment in another course or school should be aware of the serious consequences for plagiarism. Here is what I write in my syllabi:
|